This… is really not true. That’s a tertiary concern, at most, for almost everyone in those circles. The kind of misery you’re talking about is the secondary concern. The primary concern is “literal human extinction or comparable suffering for everyone within the next few decades.” Which, whether you think that’s plausible or not, is definitely the right order of “Which risks are worse if they happened.”
Based on past similar efforts, I expect the reception to this database to be “It’s great that this exists, now let’s figure out how to actually solve them and hope people take it seriously and slow down the dangerous parts of the progress being made in AI.”
