Nirvana penis baby loses lawsuit against band

I just look at it this way (and am repeating what others have said here)… if Nirvana bought some photo shoot of this guy or highlighted his art show in the 2016 or paid him a few hundred grand… suddenly this wouldn’t be child porn.

The fact that they didn’t pay him off is why he is saying it’s child porn… and that’s just basically extortion.

Not to mention, Nirvana as a legal entity doesn’t really even exist anymore. Krist has been with like, eight other groups, Kurt’s dead and all his heirs had nothing to do with this shoot, Dave’s with the Foo Fighters now and has been with them longer than he was with Nirvana… and the rest of the ship of Theseus worth of band members have been with a bunch of other groups too.

So yeah. I get his frustration that he didn’t get paid off, but you can’t just call someone child pornographers because they didn’t pay you off.

5 Likes