So you’ve declared that different candidates don’t make any actual difference as the default assumption; no general trends can be good enough to even suggest you should prove otherwise, save a rigorous controlled experiment; and no such experiment is possible.
So that’s it then; you’re right because you are, and even to suggest one should look at evidence whether that is supported makes me a partisan who won’t consider reason. Sure, whatever. I don’t know why you would want to change any hearts or minds or electoral systems, though, because there’s no indication any of that could make a difference that would pass the kind of standards you demand here.
I mean, do you actually have a proper experiment to show anything you’ve said, like that low voter turnout is the result of partisanship and extremist policy? Because however inadequate the figures I’ve given are, you’ve given none, and only wanting impossible standards for proof of positions you disagree with is partisanship.
