I know I’m right, cause I’m a historian…
And unless you got some citations of non-Christians taking biblical claims seriously, in a scholarly manner, then I don’t think that’s the case.
Immune to sarcasm, are we?
Except these were only claims made in a particular context, via a second hand account that does not claim to be objective history, but an argument for a particular faith. On it’s own, it’s not evidence of the resurrection. It’s evidence of a theological argument being made by the authors of the various gospels. They stand on different standards of evidence than a modern historian would.
