There seems to be some conflation between some of both the reporting and criticism which ignores the distinctions between supporting a cause, and working to destroy someone else’s cause. It’s like the difference between me being free to post a Clinton sign in my front yard, or deciding instead to trash my neighbor’s Trump signs. Isn’t me painting over their signs free speech? What hypocrisy!
Lucky knows that “shitposting” is designed to hinder the signal-to-noise ratio of political discourse, and hurts people in defense of a reactionary ideology. What amazes me about such people is why they suppose that people who have their representation disrupted would resign themselves to live under the former’s preferred candidate.
