So from that brief clip I seem to gather that she has a son (adopted?) who is black? Even if you’re generous enough to take everything she has said at face value, it’s not a refutation of “CRT” or the teaching of racism and its effects on society. And she has missed the all too critical step of proving that the school’s actions have had an effect on her child’s behaviour. Correlation is not causation etc., and the school can’t control how a child might apply the lessons being taught.
I hope the school district pushes back on this instead of rolling over to avoid the cost of a fight. IANAL but
1-It’s clearly a vexatious lawsuit
2-She can’t prove her child’s behaviour has changed
2b-She can’t prove that her child’s altered behaviour is actually a form of damage
2c-She can’t prove that damages have actually resulted from the lessons
Unfortunately she’ll probably get a Repugnantcan appointed judge who will lap her story up with a silver spoon.
What’s next, kids using the math they learned in school to argue they are being short-changed on their allowance!!?
