Wow. I like how they ignored signs and climbed over the fence! That would make it difficult to find for those plaintiffs and against the company (if they opted out of binding arbitration).
Although to change the location of the Pokemon might be all a plaintiff’s attorney would need to show that the location was potentially unsafe to begin with. But then to not change it would show a reckless disregard of their customers’ well-being if other players do the same thing.
Oh, man! That would be a civil court case that I’d love to watch.
Thanks for the link!
Here’s two 
for you because I have none to give right now. (I’ll be back to make things right.)
