It’s actually an interesting study of the proper use of procedural prosecution. They had concrete evidence that she tampered with 6 vaccines, and they found out that many more patients have not been vaccinated that she was responsible for. Obviously, that means she is a lying sack of shit compared to her story, but she has kept to her story that she broke 6 vials and changed those over as a one time mistake out of professional embarrassment. Her personal posts are more than enough to ruin her career and taint her name forever in any future work she does, but legally it is circumstantial along with all the other cases where people were not vaccinated.
I think that the circumstances as is should be stronger than 6 months of probation, since she is clearly a risk to the community, but this does seem like how criminal justice should work if it was ever applied fairly to all people.
