You make some firm assertions but offer no evidence, no citation. You lack any sort of credibility though because as I pointed out, if they are using passive sensors to detect alcohol, (as stated in the piece), they are doing so without informed consent, despite your statement to the contrary. If you are certain that the sturdy followed all guidelines, then you shouldn’t have any qualms about offering me a link with which to verify the claim. Who sat on the IRB? What were the study goals? How was it funded? Was HIPAA notification complied with? It’s your claim, it’s your responsibility to either offer up your evidence for the claim or to withdraw it. Which will it be, officer? I really don’t think you have the smallest clue of what human subject research protocols are.
