Robots more likely to take "male" jobs

Nope, sorry, we have machines that poop now too. (Art!)


10 Likes

At least my hitchhiking gig is safe for a while longer.

8 Likes

If labor were a significant component of housing prices. (Part of the cost of new homes, but not for existing.)

1 Like

Looks like weā€™ll all have to join your sit-in.

2 Likes

Love that one, but this is the robot that has been specifically engineered to replace me on the field:

10 Likes

Likely teflon, from how you describe the symptoms.

Even regular smoke can be pretty bad (hydrogen cyanide, anyone?). Thatā€™s why the breathing devices are used.

I donā€™t know about womenā€™s work, but if they create a BjorkBot that will talk to me about televisions 8 hours a day, I will pay all my $$$.

4 Likes

Hell, you donā€™t even need a vaguely humanoid machine for that. Just ask the EOD guys who named, and refused to give up their robots. These guys get attached, and have been known to treat the robots like pets, going so far as to demand that their own personal robot be fixed after a devastating explosion that left it as mostly scrap, than to accept a new one.

This could be saying more about the job specifically though, than it does about human-robot interaction generally. I know I get attached to my tools, but not so much that Iā€™ll be heart broken when the time comes to trade up. But thereā€™s definitely machines that I take care of that feel a bit like a pet. A very bad pet, but still a pet. Like the Roomba at my work. Although, Iā€™d rather we just had a dog, with how often it jams itself deep under a desk, then runs out of juice.

1 Like

Thereā€™s definitely sexism. Traditionally enforced no less. I was thinking as I read the headline ā€œthat makes complete senseā€.

Reason being, robots have been developed in the first place to do repetitive, back-breaking, labor-intensive tasks. This, traditionally has been done more often by males, simply because sexual dimorphism makes them better at it than females on average. So of course robots would easily replace people who do these jobs, and those people are traditionally mostly male.

But now itā€™s pretty obvious that robots can do most things, and the things they canā€™t do are all solvable, as long as you keep the problem space small enough, so now robots wonā€™t be just putting lumberjacks and automotive welders out of a job, but also data-analysts, drivers, and increasingly more skilled labor and knowledge-based tasks.

4 Likes

3 Likes

Even my effing inner voices have been automated:

3 Likes

Heh, it sounds a little like someone hooked up an instance of ELIZA to WisdomOfChopra.

1 Like

The Independent i100 has been running "Can we guess your gender using Science? " quizzes recently.

Maybe Iā€™ll be OK, the algorithms always guess Iā€™m female ā€¦ :confused:

Oh good, itā€™s a problem that mainly affects men. Then we can ignore it and never have to speak of it again.

2 Likes

3 Likes

The worst are the immigrant robots who illegally cross the border, then go after our jobs and our women!

6 Likes

What?

Construction involves several skilled trades with rigorous training programs.

6 Likes

I donā€™t think anyone said that?

[ETA] Likely because it affects men, it WILL be addressed in all seriousness.

7 Likes

We showed that Canadian robot a thing or two in Philadelphia, by howdy!

3 Likes

The factory automation is already in full swing. The process is well underway. No addressing on the radar so far.

1 Like