Given that Putin’s a Trump fan and Sanders would’ve been a lock against Trump while Clinton has a lot of baggage…are we sure that there weren’t any primary shenanigans? They’re a more important part of the process than general elections anyway.
It appears that in States with no paper trail, Clinton did disproportionately well in actual elections vs. exit polling. That variance is a little eyebrow-raising, and while there are things that could be improved about that paper and how it was described (it’s not a ‘Stanford Study’ and has not gone through a big review process), I’ve yet to see an explanation that addresses that variance (the primary concern) rather than focusing on more minor parts of the study…especially since exit poll vs. result variance is one of the key ways to identify voter fraud.
