I’m sensing some serious expert peer review happening here (imaging what a graduate journal club session would be like!) What we need of course is some “scientific evidence” that can demonstrate that this whole midi-chlorian thing is not a causative agent, but rather a misinterpreted correlation. Scientific paradigm shift?
(By the way, I would totally publish that paper at the SCQ)
p.s. Here’s another wookiee paper that doesn’t even bring up the whole midi-chlorian thing, although this one is especially technical in nature.
