I wouldn’t suggest psychologists aren’t scientists at all, that would be unfair. But you’re scientists only as far as us medical doctors are scientists when we’re doing clinical research. Where the natural ‘hard’ sciences really can get 5-sigma results, we have to make do with p=0.05 —and even that has to be taken with an exceedingly large pinch of salt because the stats might have been (probably were) done as part of a statistical significance fishing expedition …
So sorry, but despite believing
I reckon you need to come sit with us quacks in the soft science corner … 
