nah, the law turns around the presumption of innocence, take a look at section 57 of the terror act.
A person commits an offence if he possesses an article in circumstances which give rise to a reasonable suspicion that his possession is for a purpose connected with the commission, preparation or instigation of an act of terrorism.
how to defend against this? what is “reasonable suspicion”? an USB stick with a live OS is superhandy, and while I carry around Knoppix and grml something like TAILS shouldn’t be able to add another charge for the suspect.
I’m fine with using this as additional evidence for the core charge (supporting terrorism if I read the articles correctly) but punishing someone for the possession of an anonymizing is not compatible with my impression of the rule of law.
