The tactic used by some U.S. papers is to put questionable* content in the Op-Ed section. That way, when readers call them out on it the editors can sputter that it’s just the author’s opinion, and has nothing to do with the views of the publication presenting those views to the masses. If the issue causes enough controversy they might also issue a nonpology and ramble about both sides of every issue (while looking for the next editorial opportunity to increase readership and raise ad revenue).
*Sexist, racist, phobic, intolerant, etc…
