I understand what you said, it was clear from the beginning, what I am saying is it doesn’t make sense. Well it does, but you would have to suppose that anybody here had a choice. You would also have to suppose that he chose Russia as his destination for asylum, but if you follow the timeline, you’ll see he got stuck in Russia while in transit someplace else, you would also see that he petitioned other governments for asylum.
So reading anything into where he is, and furthermore, using it to dismiss or diminish his claims only drives you away from the evidence which, alone, should prove his claims. Wait, not just the evidence, but the response from the accused is pretty telling too.
You cant be also saying that his accusations are more serious if made from (insert country) rather than from Russia right?
Wait, you are saying that. Well, that’s just silly.
