Well I tried at least three times, so there, smarty pants. 
I actually liked the point he was making, and would call the book an exploration of how reasoning can best be modeled and conveyed in notation and why mathematics is only a subset of the optimal conceivable notations.
But Wolfram makes me look like the soul of brevity, you know? It’s like reading Fraser’s unexpurgated Golden Bough… dude, I get it, next point please!
