Yea, thats what Clinton said.
I only have two choices, A or B? An B has terrible consequences? Im beginning to suspect that you are trying to lead me into a false dichotomy. Why do both alternatives have to be ‘aggressive’. And for that matter, why does the option you disagree with lead to “serious negative consequences”?
Also, it seems to me you are ignoring one fact, the aforementioned CRA.
Did you read the IBD article?
Your gluten-free, liberal pal,
Bobby.
