A lot of what you have written has suggested this but never mind. Again you decide which laws have no victims and which laws do not. You set a standard on when it is acceptable to break laws and when it is not. Apparently you consider yourself superior to the combined wisdom and knowledge of the judiciary.
So I correct, you believe a person should be allowed to break any law YOU feel is acceptable as you are clearly the high authority on what is acceptable.
I think your your position is not too liberal, it is not the liberalism that is at fault… I think it is childish, naive, ridiculous, opposed to order and supports criminals, poorly thought through, idealistic and the product of someone out of touch with reality. ( I figured while you were going to list biased opinions and state them as if they were an argument I should at least point out that your argument is just as poor if not more so).
