That would all be fine if everybody was like you, willing to allow others to explore uncertain and conflicting opinions. But they aren’t, and in some cases they can be quite aggressive about it.
I think I can see where this is going. You’re arguing that just about everyone in the entire world should be different to what they are now, I’m arguing that they’re not and won’t be. Seems to me we’re both right.
I’d also agree that increased exposure is an inevitability and so “surveillance” should be made into a public service. But I’d also say that there always will be and always should be some channels available for anonymity.
