I am not sure what you are getting at here. I would go so far as to say that life is exploration, and that there is not any real certainty to anything. Anonymity is fine, but kind of a diversion, as personal identity seems to be largely a McGuffin in the first place. The same “individual” can profess to dozens of even contrary views, which they may earnestly reconcile somehow, or only claim as a rhetorical device - I never have any way to conclusively know. Nor does anybody else. The “real” views of a person are also likely to change over time.
That’s not the point I was making. It is that since connectivity exists, and isn’t going anywhere, people either control it - or it is used to control them. When surveillance is controlled by an alienated elite who lack transparency, they can use it to further entrench their advantage of perceived power over others. But when everybody has equal access, they can’t.
