The replies to this have convinced me I really have to break my points down to bite-size, so people don’t latch on to the one part they don’t like. Nobody, among us bastions of morality, wanted to talk about why the gender of the female prostitutes wasn’t mentioned.
I assume you work for a private company. Do you want shareholders demanding the details of your personal life and finances to see how THEIR dollars were spent? Is the claim that SS agents actually billed prostitutes to the government? Why wasn’t that the headline? Being a government employee doesn’t make you a slave. You get paid your own money.
I’m not saying there aren’t legitimate points in her case, but the big bullet points seem kinda crap to me. If you do have the honest opinion that the stability of a family is relevant to an employer, then I have no argument right now. I am not saying sexual harassment is okay. I am saying I don’t quite trust this woman’s motives.
