Actually no, that part I thought you had a good point. I don’t know the answer, so there didn’t any reason to reply to that part simply to be typing if I didn’t have anything to say. Oh, and I am most definitely no bastion of morality 
As I said before, being an agent of the US Secret Service and working for a private firm aren’t the same. That in fact is a big reason why I’m generally opposed to the use of private security contractors by the armed forces, not because I’m opposed to mercenaries in principle, but because public servants work for we the people. But if they spent their own money and it was legal for them (not just in that country but as USSS agents), then there’s plenty of other misconduct to address. If they expensed any part of it, including transportation, that’s a problem. Even if they didn’t but they were under US jurisdiction and violated the law, that too is a problem. All that’s been covered by me and others in earlier posts.
Embarrassment of riches?
I can’t speak to that since I don’t know what they are. But I’m a brass tacks kind of person. If she followed the law bringing to public light widespread violations of the law by law enforcement agents, then that’s what matters to me.
