Yes. To be honest, she kind of came off as not all there. If it weren’t for the stacks of research on the table, I wouldn’t think she was a driven person. I don’t dislike her, but she does creep me out a little. But she didn’t strike me as making the reporter her mouthpiece. Maybe I’m wrong.
Frankly, when I first read it, I pretty much just dismissed that phrase because it’s so sensationalistic, and I tend to tune out that kind of tone to extract non-vague facts. So the other points, especially the office abuses, were of more interest to me.
It was not very long. But yeah, I’d like specifics about that statement too.
Maybe, the reporter seemed mildly enthusiastic about the subject. He didn’t seem disinterested.
I don’t think it’s a well written or sufficiently detailed article. I don’t think I’d much like her or the reporter. But neither do I think it was pure fluff and smear.
