The Anti-Tsundoku Book Club

Finished it. It was okay. It was fine, even. The endless 80s references actually became background noise after a bit, and I might have had an easier time because a lot of them went over my head. By contrast, I sputtered at a passage comparing whacking off to knocking a proton off a hydrogen atom, which makes no sense.

You know what it reads like? A really bad YA novel I was into as a kid for some reason called Dragonhome. It’s really written in service to the reader, almost as wish-fulfillment. The clunky dialogue is really there to make certain things happen a certain way. It reads like a personal fantasy. In a way, I totally understand the appeal. What if I could find romance and personal wealth just by doing what I already do and am good at? Like what if there was a multibillion dollar contest to see who was best at surfing YouTube videos and making snarky comments online? This is the essence of a fantasy where exceedingly pointless 80s trivia can make your dreams come true. In a way, I can’t even be mad about it as a premise, because clearly his knowledge of 80s trivia made Cline a lot of money.

I was vaguely aware that there were some hot-takes on the book, especially post gamergate, but I decided to wait until after I read the book to avoid having my opinion clouded by them. I don’t think they land as hard as the authors of the aforementioned hot-takes probably think they do. It’s a potboiler that took off. That’s really all there is to it. Cline’s writing is symptomatic of a lot of things but it’s not like he’s an architect of reactionary ideals.

I could talk about the ways the book doesn’t answer a lot of questions I have about its postapocalyptic world, but when I start asking those questions I end up in the same place: Why didn’t he write the book I wanted him to write? Which is not how I like to evaluate books. I will say that a portion of the book came across a much poorer version of The Space Merchants. But now that I got that off my chest, I’d like to focus on the book Cline tried to write: A book for adults, and he failed to do that.

It’s a YA novel. Not that I have a problem with YA novels, but that’s what it is. That’s its heart and soul. It reads like one and it feels like one. I think once I started evaluating it as one, the cookie-cutterness of its characters didn’t bother me as much. I could relate to the protagonist more easily when I realized that the reader is the protagonist. Bring your baggage with you and you’ll still fit right in.

It’s designed that way, right from the beginning with a plot device of great convenience: Dead parents. That’s your backstory if you want a young adolescent protagonist that a reader can project and compare their actions to. “No way my mom would let me miss that much school… but his parents are dead, so what would I do in this situation…?”

Similarly, we have our conveniently smitten love interest. (Who, let’s be clear, does not matter in this book beyond her function in that capacity.) It’s cringeworthy in parts, but other parts, like one chapter that features a chat conversation between her and the main character ring cringe-worthily true for a certain person (and let’s really not name names here coughReactionabecough) who may have had chat conversations that looked very similar as a teenager. (Although, I’d actually have met the girl in real life.) Cline really doesn’t know how to write women characters, just the shadows we tend to recognize as feminine.

All of that said, Cline keeps the stakes high and the tensions taught. All the guns our Tolstoy warns about go off, and he managed to fool me into forgetting about many of them until they went off. Parts of it read very sincerely as loving odes to things remembered, and some of it actually comes across as sweet. I strongly suspected there was a hidden code in the book, and I wasn’t disappointed. I like it that Cline did that. It’s disappointing when books about characters solving puzzles or riddles don’t themselves contain one. At least that’s how I’ve often felt.

Cline delivered a book that I felt good about finishing, but one I’m going to set aside and never read again. Maybe if it came to me at the exact right time in my life, I’d have fallen in love with it, as many have. Then I’d probably read it over and over again and not realize it’s problems until I was much older. Instead, I’m curious to know just how awful Dragonhome really was, after all these years.

6 Likes

yeah, I agree… people I know who “loved” it seem to have mostly loved it for the 80’s nostalgia, and that is all. I did find it a bit overbearing, as if the author was trying too hard to fit in as many 80’s references as he could. I didn’t hate it, but after years of reading Pratchett, I find most author’s writing to be not very interesting…

I did just start reading NOS4A2, which I think I originally put on my “to read” list after reading something here on BB…

2 Likes

I’m curious to hear how you like NOS4A2. I’ve considered reading it a half dozen times and never picked it up. Maybe I’m overthinking.

1 Like

Very good!

All of Joe Hill’s books and short stories I’ve read have been at the very least worth the time spent, and usually much better.

1 Like

So far, I’ve been impressed by the writing and the story is engaging. I’d been biding my time reading Prime Reading stuff, which is okay and keeps me reading, but you really notice good writing after reading some of those “freebies”.

I think hearing NOS4A2 being made into a mini series (or whatever) kinda nudged me to finally read it…

1 Like

Started Stephen Wolfram’s A New Kind of Science. Premature, seeing as how I’ve yet to hear back from any of the grad schools I applied to, but I wanted to start brainstorming some ideas I want to explore:

50 pages in and Stephen Wolfram is obviously a smart guy, but he spends way too much time talking about how important the work is, and misunderstanding and taking for granted fields he doesn’t understand very well. I see what he’s driving at, and I’m interested and think it has potential, but he’s turning it into a slog with promises. Show, don’t tell.

3 Likes

With Mike Pence sitting just a couple cheeseburgers away from the Oval Office, Chris Hedges’ American Fascists: the Christian Right and the War on America should probably be required reading for everyone. Hedges, a graduate of Harvard Divinity School, turns a nuanced eye on the evangelical movement in the US, tracing its growth in recent decades, dissecting its aims, and sounding an alarm as the movement’s reach grows ever closer to the levers of power.

One of the central themes in American Fascists is that fundamentalism thrives as a reaction to progress. Dislocation and inequity, born of our blind rush to technological sophistication, are the lifeblood of Xtian extremism. People caught at the edges and in the rifts of cultural change are a potent force in the world, waiting for someone to give them direction. Xtian leaders like James Kennedy, Pat Robertson, and Rod Parsley exploit such people for personal gain, happily shaping them into an army, and aiming them at Washington, D.C.

Those of us who treasure inquiry above faith, who choose love over fear, and who opt for inclusion over xenophobia should beware. Mike Pence is only the most visible of the extremists that have infiltrated our public institutions; there is no shortage of others quietly working to shape the US into a theocracy. To paraphrase Hedges (who is paraphrasing Popper), loving tolerance does not mean tolerating the intolerant. This is not a quick read, but it’s well worth your time.

Edited to remove a paragraph that was colorful but added nothing.

2 Likes

Nearly done with part one of Fire and Blood by GRRM…

http://www.georgerrmartin.com/grrm_book/fire-and-blood/

It reads very much like a medieval history. The Dance of Dragons which is regularly referenced in ASOIAF/GOT is pretty rough. The first book is about 130-150 or so years prior to Robert’s rebellion and about that far from Aegon’s conquest. It certainly is great and very useful back story to ASOIAF/GOT so far.

3 Likes

In Loaded, Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz uses the Second Amendment as a lens to examine the threads of violence and racism that are woven into the fabric of American culture. Her thesis regards the Second as the principle buttress of Manifest Destiny and a ratification of the genocide waged on America’s indigenous people. In the racist policing of today it sees the lineage of Cotton Kingdom slave patrols and it names the KKK and the Patriot movement as descendants of the colonial ranger militias that terrorized the leading edge of westward expansion. Ultimately, it argues that America’s love affair is not with guns, it is with white supremacy.

Loaded is not a long book, but it is a book whose point of view is writ large. It’s difficult sometimes to discern how much of the content is emphasis and how much is factual, but the book is extensively footnoted and has added a lot of material to my reading list. In my opinion, it’s worth your time.

3 Likes

This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.