And a support center will help with this issue exactly HOW?
A compensation of a disability with a wearable (or, even better, implanted) electronics is superior to any kind of ongoing third-party maintenance. As a social outcast anyway, I will not, repeat NOT, give up the potential advantages just because somebody says I should, without offering anything of similar value to compensate. And if you will attempt to punch me for that, you’ll get a faceful of pepper spray in a legitimate and perhaps even legal self-defense. Offer something positive in exchange and I may consider a negotiation.
Sorry for the confrontational tone but I am waiting for this kind of tech for decades. For both the compensation of cognitive issues with people, enhanced spatial awareness, and realtime connection to data feeds (and, in workshop setting, better interconnection with the machines). I will not take any respects to a bunch of luddites who insist on standing in the way. Judging from the amount of augmented reality stuff - and way better than Google’s - emerging on both Kickstarter and trade shows, you cannot stop it anyway.
There was a social outrage against cellphones. They are now the norm. Against bluetooth earpieces; a norm now. Against cellphone cameras; a norm now. Now we’re getting the same with yet another tech; tomorrow it will be the norm again.
