Er… can’t tell if you’re mocking my ideas with that video or something else?
Sorry if I’m being dense, but I don’t understand how that esoteric meme applies to my post. Please elaborate. Are you implying NKS concepts, etc. are too amorphous, unscientific or something?
Meanwhile, (as Wolfram mentions) there’s the applied NKS academic literature with hundreds of new models:
Hair patterns in mice. Shapes of human molars. Collective butterfly motion. Evolution of soil thicknesses. Interactions of trading strategies. Clustering of red blood cells in capillaries. Patterns of worm appendages. Shapes of galaxies. Effects of fires on ecosystems. Structure of stromatolites. Patterns of leaf stomata operation. Spatial spread of influenza in hospitals. Pedestrian traffic flow. Skin cancer development. Size distributions of companies. Microscopic origins of friction. And many, many more.
I apologize if I misunderstand your intent, but without context, I’m not really sure what you’re getting at by posting that video in response to my post.
