The Minnesotan left-wing economic miracle continues, while neighboring Republican states slowly collapse

While I highly approve of the boosterism of the great state of Minnesota and it’s fantastic governor, I do have one nit to pick. That would be the age of the article. Almost 2 years old. Now, if you can find another recent one, Woohoo! Sadly, right now Dayton gets to deal with a Republican majority in the House and Senate and they can’t even get our driver’s license snafu (one side thinks RealID is a plot to register all Americans for concentration camps, the other wants illegal immigrants to be eligible for Driver’s Licenses) worked out.

2 Likes

Note, not endorsing either side of the Driver’s License fracas. Just pointing out the gulf between the two sides of the issue.

Venezuela didn’t fail because of socialism, particularly, but because they relied far too heavily on one product, petroleum. European socialist countries have diversified economies, which protect them from any particular industry or resource tanking. Bad management will damage any system, regardless of politics. Even if you take the Greek example, you can call them badly managed (a defensible claim), but it’s that they can’t control the value of their currency that is making them suffer so badly. Under the drachma, they’d just declare bankruptcy, depreciate the drachma, sell more and pull out of it. Not what I’d recommend, but they didn’t ask me, and it worked (sort of) for years. Now they’re having to undergo a painful cultural change.

5 Likes

no European country (maybe with the exception of Belarus) uses a socialist form of government. all of them are free market economies with a regulating legal framework.

11 Likes

Or most everyone on the “hill” are just a bunch of assholes who lie through their teeth more often then not.

Same-difference I guess!

1 Like

I’ll summarize it for the “I’M IN COLLEGE! LET ME SPEW SOME ECONOMICS I JUST LEARNEDS IN CLASS TODAY!” crowd that are mucking up the comments with garbage gibberish. Plus, I’m old, grumpy, and want to hurt their feelings!

Guy mostly in charge of Minnesota is not an asshole, magically making life better for everyone. Scientists and college kids baffled.

9 Likes

The story goes that a famous (and famously waggish) liberal Russian emigre is finally invited to return to the country of his birth in the 1930s to see what the regime he’s supported in principal for the past decade has wrought. At the tour’s end, he’s asked what impressions he will be taking back to Europe with him, to which he responds: “I’ve seen a lot of broken eggs, Comrade, but I must ask you: where are all these omelettes I’ve been hearing so much about?”

10 Likes

This thread:

24 Likes

Moreover, when discussing this with family, it is their sincere belief ‘oh you need to PUNISH someone for doing well and give it to the lazy motherfucker that isn’t strong enough to not be lazy and useless? THIS IS INCINTIVE RITE?!’

to be fair, at the time I responded to him there was more red meat which got eaten.

This Thread:

4 Likes

The video I was looking for but couldn’t find:

3 Likes

It’s maddening. “Our government is failing and doesn’t work and if elected I intend to prove it.”

16 Likes
9 Likes

Look, you’re after your own straw man. Not only did I not mention Mussolini, but I didn’t even say it was a fact. I said “Saying the trains ran on time under the Nazi’s is not promoting fascism”. My point was that if you don’t try and understand what’s attractive to some people about racism, Fascism, Conservatism or whatever, how can you combat it? Yet people said even discussing positive aspects is promoting them, which I feel is anti-intellectual BS, equivalent to saying studying the history of war is inherently pro-war. So many high horses around here it’s easy to get trampled.

1 Like

I can see why that would be worrisome for a dog that spends so much time barking up the wrong tree.

16 Likes

feelings and intellect are pretty different things, perhaps untangle that bit of language before asking other people to unpack their inherent contradictions? My two cents.

4 Likes

The only people who’ve made that false claim in earnest since 1945 have been promoting fascism, or at least trying to excuse it.

That’s a reasonable point, but claiming something that never happened (i.e. making the trains run on time) is one of the things that made fascism attractive to people is not. There are plenty of other easily understood examples available about what made fascism attractive to certain people that make it unnecessary to resort to a long-discredited one. By doing the latter you derailed (as it were) your own valid point.

ETA: I posted this excerpt from a recent interview with Guillermo del Toro elsewhere, but it’s appropriate to your point:

“What interests me about fascism is that it is a black hole of free will,” he has said. “It is a system which isn’t necessarily unique, but it absolves brutality, it absolves the lack of morals and it absolves people of their own decisions. When they tell you ‘you can kill these people because they are Jews, reds or homosexuals, or whatever!’ In this world you can permit a brutal action on the base of collective advice; that is what scares me.”

He understands the appeal of fascism: “One of the dangers of fascism and one of the dangers of true evil in our world—which I believe exists—is that it’s very attractive. That it is incredibly attractive in a way that most people negate. Most people make their villains ugly and nasty and I think, no, fascism has a whole concept of design, and a whole concept of uniforms and set design that made it attractive to the weak-willed”

15 Likes

Perhaps it was poorly chosen, but I did not research it as it was not the point I was trying to make, I did NOT claim it happened, I used it as an example statement. Focusing on that rather than the point I was making seems deliberately combative and obfuscative.

1 Like

Careful, trampling danger ahead!

[quote=“gellfex, post:166, topic:97230, full:true”]
Perhaps it was poorly chosen, but I did not research it as it was not the point I was trying to make, I did NOT claim it happened, I used it as an example statement.[/quote]

No “perhaps” about it. It was very poorly chosen. Your very good point deserved better support than an unresearched example that’s already been widely debunked. We all make mistakes that do ourselves disservices like this, and it’s not a terrible thing to admit it and get back to the main discussion.

5 Likes