There’s UNESCO’s “red list”: UNESCO World Heritage Centre - List of World Heritage in Danger
There are several reasons why a heritage site might be put on that list, among others:
“[…] serious and specific dangers, such as the threat of disappearance caused by accelerated deterioration, large- scale public or private projects or rapid urban or tourist development projects; destruction caused by changes in the use or ownership of the land […]”
(from the Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, Article 11(4), emphasis mine)
So, for example, the “Historic Centre of Vienna” was put on the red list because UNESCO disapproves of a skyscraper that is being built a little outside the center.
Now, most of these decisions are “clean” in that there is no further political baggage behind them, so that’s a difference. But does that mean they shouldn’t be counted when you want to run a count of “resolutions against Israel” vs. “resolutions against the rest of the world”?
