Bangers and mash as breakfast, was that you?
Monty Python?
Another NEVER-WAS twunt, vying for some attention any way she can get it.
Probably just mad because even as a cis-het bio-woman, she will never be as physically attractive as some of the goddesses who have come out as Trans:
And as for being pretty on the inside?
She could ‘eat makeup’ for the rest of her life, and it still wouldn’t help.
Who is obsessed with identity politics again?
Alabama
Kentucky
Missouri
Montana
Tennessee
Texas
South Dakota
Utah
Arizona
All on my NEVER LIVE THERE list that I started back when abortion was the main concern of fascists and bigots. I guess I can redouble that now…
Yeah - if I have to move there in my golden years - I’ve lost at life.
Because of course she did on her way out the door.
“ The memo seeks to significantly warp the Supreme Court’s landmark 2020 ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County , which established that employment laws barring discrimination on the basis of sex also prohibit discrimination based on sexuality and gender identity.
While the court ruling concerned workplace protections enshrined in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the same arguments could be applied to a swathe of other civil rights laws including Title IX, which prohibits discrimination based on sex in education.”
“ In its ruling, the court concluded: “It is impossible to discriminate against a person for being homosexual or transgender without discriminating against that individual based on sex.”
The Trump administration memo, however, seems to reach the exact opposite conclusion from the Supreme Court, arguing that the court’s ruling “is consistent with and further supports the department’s long-standing construction of the term ‘sex’ in Title IX to mean biological sex, male or female”.”
The complete opposite of the law.
As always- but wait - there’s more!