I see what you did there 
The tricky question, of course, is how you work out the shape of “true Christianity”. It’s easy to pick a version that seems nicer, or that conforms to a preconceived notion of what true Christianity should mean. But I’ve also noticed that these preconceived notions tend to be generic and could equally apply to “true Hindu” or “true Muslim”.
I don’t say this because I want to endorse any of the negative things you talk about here (!!), but because it is worth asking how we assess the true version of this (or any) faith.
