Why, because a real-life fact got in the way of a false assumption? Is that how the ersatz urbane deal with life? That 2.6 million people cannot go up against ONE man tells me those 2.6 million people are in a sorry state.
I have placed my real name and what I say is true and verifiable. You can choose to ignore and dismiss whatever you like, reality is not going to change because it is inconvenient.
But you make me laugh: one anecdote is fact, but the one that works against your theory is not?
Nice try, but I am not buying anyone’s propaganda. I have heard empty self-serving words for too long to have any respect for them…