I agree. Since they named the chief ‘villain’ Lord Business I kind of assumed that it would have the seemingly modern standard “we can’t have anyone else be the bad-guy without protests or hurting profits in some overseas market… lets make the villain an Occidental businessman” vague anti-capitalism Progressive gestures (perhaps to offset the fact that as others pointed out it is a big marketing campaign for toys). Then I saw the movie and… well I don’t want to spoil anything, but when you find out more about who Lord/President Business is then suddenly it makes sense.
But if they haven’t seen the movie then it is understandable to me why they’d think a movie with a villain named “Lord Business” would be anti-capitalist.
