That is a legal interpretation, again, is this your opinion or the opinion of an authority?
You are arguing as if you haven’t made your point clear, as if we only understood it, we would agree. This is not the case. You will actually have to make the case that “Situations arose that weren’t adequately covered”, just because an authority has said this is the case, does not make it something that cannot be challenged.
Other’s have contested your facts, I am contesting your argument. It is not actually an argument, it’s not even wrong.
