If we were to have war crimes trials, there are a whole lot of people involved in far more serious ways and far more responsible who we’d want to try first. Her role was a vote to authorize force was one out of 77. While she was wrong, she didn’t wage the war, nor cook the intelligence, nor press for the war other than in a (deeply wrong) vote. At the time she wasn’t on any Senate committees that would have given her any more privileged information than the false information the Bush admin was providing. While it’s easy to claim that it was obvious they were being lied to in hindsight, at the time I wouldn’t expect unambiguous certainty. It’s a bit different when you’re the one who is being targeted by a carefully orchestrated campaign of lies (and political coercion) to manipulate you into a decision rather than an external observer with no role. Her vote was wrong, but to attribute some kind of willing complicity to invade, or to attribute the level of the responsibility for the Iraq invasion itself that you do is sort of warped.
4 Likes
