Of course this is not the case. However, there are examples of left-wing authoritarianism that could have been cited (e.g. only being allowed to live where the State tells you) that do not automatically imply, as Political Compass did, that any support for government is “authoritarian”, which simply removes all meaning from the word.
[edit 2 - I now realise that you are cherry picking examples from the Political Compass test. I apologise to them; it is you that have agenda, not them.]
[edit - I’m currently reading Archie Brown’s Rise and Fall of Communism in which he makes an important point - the countries that NATO called “Communist” did not regard themselves as communist. (USSR stands for the Union of Socialist Workers’ Councils Republics). For them they were socialist, which was an authoritarian State run on communist lines and in which traces of capitalist thinking must be purged until communism was achieved, in which the State would wither away. If this sounds a lot like the Jewish dream of the Messiah and the eventual coming of the perfect society, remember that Marx was the grandson of a rabbi. McCarthy wasn’t totally wrong in conflating Communist and Jewish thinking.]
