My candidate was Sanders, but I agree with your original post, Clinton is unbelievably talented. Also, making HRC look beautiful was not difficult for Leibowitz, Clinton was and is a beautiful woman, a fact agreed by people on both sides of the political spectrum back when her husband was in the news for his social predilections.
[quote=“Haystack, post:31, topic:87697”]
She may have cast hundreds of votes in the senate, but she failed on the issues that mattered most.[/quote]
No. A different vote from her wouldn’t have made a difference, so of all the things she’s been involved in it is one of the least important. It became a meaningful symbol of the difference between her and Sanders during the primary (and Sanders vote was important for him), but that primary is long over.
[quote=“Haystack, post:31, topic:87697”]
She’s beholden to her party [/quote]
Wait, I thought she was manipulating the party, the evil Clinton telling the DNC what to do. Which is it, is she beholden to them or are they beholden to her? If you’re right and she’s beholden to them, that’s OK with me, I’m a lifelong Democrat and I strongly support their platform this year.
