Then why bother forging signatures? Why bother even going through the motions of creating more accounts? Why are the people who ordered the actions and those who performed them not being prosecuted for forgery and fraud?
If the bank just steals money right out from the original account, aren’t they protected by the same legal mechanism for theft as well as fraud and forgery? If a customer is murdered on bank property by a bank employee over a technical dispute concerning that customers account, should the feds just throw up their hands and mutter “Binding contractual agreement”?
What is the significance of the forging of documents?
Are the customers the only entity that can seek justice?
Where does the legally binding language within the forged documents come into play? Are the forged documents legally binding? Does a lack of prosecution of fraud and forgery of the bank by the feds constitute a tacit statement that it is possible to sign away your legal rights? Is it also a statement that signatures can transmogrify an illegal action into a slightly naughty one?
Sure, the legal bullshit of the original contracts is one pylon, but there seem to have been so many others built. 
Anyway I’m still awake. Better try for an hour or two before a social function tonight.
Au revoir! And I will attempt to be more lucid and make more sense tomorrow, I know this is not the best, most awakest and lucid I could be.
