I didn’t say anything about their political leaning. That’s irrelevant to how factual their reporting is.
Maybe, but that article is garbage. Unsourced and clearly the data they are referring to is so badly misinterpreted as to come to a very wrong conclusion.
You being 80% more likely to have an accident because of eating is a completely different thing than “80% of all accidents are caused by eating”.
On the very surface that’s a patently ridiculous claim. It fails on basic plausibility alone.
