Note I don’t say an end to work, but an end to employment. Hard work towards something meaningful is often its own reward- Hard work towards someone else’s wealth, well…
It is probably just an issue with the language being used, but I don’t think working is a necessary part of being a “normal healthy person”. Whitman and Thoreau occur to me as first-class examples of happy mutants that lived for leisure and celebrated their laziness.
Yeah, you’re right about the issue of language; I honestly don’t consider either one to be a “normal healthy person” - happy mutant is probably a better description!
But anyway as I recall Thoreau celebrated the small works he did, like piling up a brick or two, and commented on how satisfying it was to make simple efforts (he hadn’t any real physical skills as far as I can remember) and of course he claimed that he constantly studied, which as any student knows can be hard work.
Those slight labours which afford me a livelihood, and by which it is allowed that I am to some extent serviceable to my contemporaries, are as yet commonly a pleasure to me, and I am not often reminded that they are a necessity. – Thoreau
Whitman and Russell, yeah, they did scorn work in their prose, but then again they sure worked hard when they clearly did not have to.
I’ve also seen it suggested that he was a damned good stand-up comedian.
“Hard work” never feels that hard when it’s something you actually want to do – and in that case it’s often energizing rather than tiring or draining. I can’t help but feel the English language is failing us when it comes to discussing human effort and motivation!
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.