No, not really – it’s more like
-
a giant infodump is hard to respond to coherently, if it is making a bunch of points, which ones merit a response? Is it unfair to respond to only one of 10 points made? Did you respond to the most important points, and how can you even tell?
-
a giant infodump is a lot to read and process, it puts significant burden on the reader. How do you tease apart what was said and reformulate it into something that can be responded to succinctly without spending 15 minutes thinking about it?
So “cool story bro” is more like “I appreciate that you posted this, but how in the world am I supposed to respond to it?” The appreciation is real, but so is the burden imposed on readers.
