Hell, why did trump-n-company fire Sally Yates when she was sensibly warning against someone who was apparently already compromised? The simplest/Occam’s-razor-est is that those who have been turned were required to protect the turned. That is, there are others in the white-house, likely trump himself, taking orders to some degree from the Russians. …but that can’t (yet) be spoken! as it’s too alarming; we’re still at the stage of declaring anyone who suggests such to be a conspiracy nut. (but i’m pretty inured in that regard [wink])
1 Like
