My homeowner’s insurance company covers my off-road vehicles for theft and damage, provided I do not operate on the street. Even though one vehicle is worth +$20K, the insurance company has not asked for the VIN to provide coverage. Same company includes fire, theft and some liability coverage for firearms without asking for serial numbers – even specialty firearms theft coverage only asks for serial numbers when one single firearm has a value over $2,500.
None of my off-road vehicles are registered, one doesn’t even have a title. Insurance company is OK with that also. They won’t cover me if I take it out on public roads except when transported on a trailer, but I am fine with that limitation.
[quote=“Mangochin, post:95, topic:75078, full:true”]
3 US states do not have mandatory insurance for drivers on public roads.
The meaning one is putting their car in storage and/or has little to no intention to use it in public. Which would put liability considerations as part of one’s homeowners insurance as part of their premises liability. All states have compulsory insurance for cars intended on being used in the general public. [/quote]
You have failed to read the entire Wikipedia entry you cite.
My state does not have compulsory insurance for cars intended on being used in the general public. We are one of the least expensive states to buy insurance in, so most people choose to do so, but neither drivers nor cars are required to be insured.
[quote]Nobody can argue with a straight face that the national VIN number
registration used by the National Insurance Crime Board constitutes a
possibility of revocation of rights or confiscation.[/quote]
They might if there were dedicated lobbying organizations working to pass local and national confiscation laws, and had success at passing state laws requiring owners of specific makes and models to give them up, and registration details were used to implement confiscation.
