Wish I could. Internet is off because I am moving. It’s equally low when discussing Clinton’s ethics, to say ‘give me three unambiguous examples’. Clinton behaviour is quintessentially ambiguous. It’s the neccessary ingredient. She’s not going to respond to a goldman sachs lobbyists request with a memo saying ‘$225k and I’ll think about it’. But she’ll accept grotesque speaking fees from them with a wink. Not trying to drag you into this, just explaining why the whole argument is just stupid to begin with. This is modern politics, Clinton isn’t especially evil, she’s just good at it.
Also, the waters be muddy:
