I guess, that’s an open enough speculation as to be meaningless without further elaboration.
Internet terms of service are framed as defining the rights and responsibilities of sites as well as users. It is not at all unusual for them to be exceedingly vague, unreasonable, unlawful, unenforceable - as well as capriciously or otherwise inconsistently enforced. And coupled with these problems, large populations use these sites and services despite claiming to have reservations or even outright disagreements with those terms. Assuming that anybody bothered to read and parse their legalese.
The saying goes that walking down the street is the most basic political act. If online sites and services desire to co-opt public space for discourse, we need to find ways to deal with the fact that our conversations are and will be to some degree, political.
