I don’t even know where to start with your comment. I didn’t say anything about The Intercept or Glen Greenwald. But, yes, he thoroughly debunked the article, yes, it was factual, but several journalists and outlets thoroughly ripped that WaPo article to shreds. I am basing my statements on several of these debunkings, but mainly TruthDig (they were on WaPo’s list), uh, Robert Scheer’s Truthdig (he didn’t win a Pulitzer like Greenwald, but he was nominated and a finalist for his work at NYT). Are all of these journos in on Greenwald’s ‘disinfo campaign’ or is it a solo thing?
Have you even spent 5 minutes researching ProporNot, the anonymous new ‘research’ group that refuses to disclose a single thing about their membership, methodology, sources, etc (and behaves like a Partisan alt-left teenage trolley group, based on their juvenile twitter posts), that the Post article based it’s claims on? You want to tell me they have more credibility than the entire progressive press?
It is baffling to me that you can even defend that WaPo piece. I’m not going to waste another word telling you why it’s trash at best, and straight up intentional propaganda at worst, because it is so obviously so, that the onus is on you to show how in the fuck that piece a) should have been published b) has a shred of credibility.
