He’s the one who started that disinfo campaign, which is why I’d mentioned him specifically.
You can only believe that if you didn’t read the WaPo raticle he was carefully misframing and misrepresenting.
Others chimed in once he started, though not all were dishonest. There are very serious issues with PropOrNot, and not everyone lied about WaPo listing names, lied about nonexistent “blacklists”, etc.
The section on PropOrNot had issues, but the article wasn’t about PropOrNot per se, they were one of four sources, and they weren’t a central source.
If you looked at the article, you’d discover this isn’t true. That should be a concern - you’ve been lied to.
Well glad to hear it. I’d recommend you might want to read the WaPo article itself carefully and consider the claims made about it, it’s remarkable how much misinformation was levied, and given the topic of the article, the propaganda campaign against it’s rather interesting.
