But @jeezers was also accusing @strokeybeard of being exactly that kind of centrist (which they deny). As far as I can tell, the only basis for that accusation is @strokeybeard’s refusal to condone nazi-punching. So isn’t it fair to take that as a “with us or against us” argument and criticise it accordingly?
Uhm… unless I’ve mistaken the meaning of the word “you”, let me spell it out for you:
I haven’t been defending Nazis.
I haven’t been defending Nazis’ free speech rights.
I haven’t been defending people who defend Nazis.
I have been defending people who you are falsely accusing of defending Nazis (in this thread, not the other one).
Apparently, you’ve just moved from accusing @strokeybeard of saying and supporting things they never said, to lumping me in as having the same opinion. And apparently it is irrelevant what “we” deny, or what we’re actually saying for that matter.
Wait… what was the claim that they are repeating? What was the correction? After all, the only person to claim that Spencer is not a Nazi was Spencer himself. Yet for some reason, people keep claiming that @strokeybeard said so, too, despite multiple clarifications…
You know, discussions tend to be much more productive when people don’t have to waste their time proving that they are actually saying what they are saying…
And I wonder what people will soon claim that I have said…
