In before the snark takes over this thread.
I reckon she’s on to something extremely important. In countries where IT technology has yet to penetrate as deeply as it has in the West, the ability for suppressive governments to purchase surveillance technology has been the cause of countless extrajudicial civilian deaths.
Why should this continue unregulated? This thread could end up looking like the US gun debate where the call for some degree of regulation inevitably will meet cries of fundamental rights being violated.
