Dotcom suggests going to a well-known newspaper with a proven track-record in handling leaks.
As long as it's their candidate in power, the rest of the media and Team Blue seem pretty hunky-dory with unrestricted domestic spying, wiretaps and secret DOJ letters that squash the 1st and 5th Amendments.
As far as abuses of power go, this feels like a much lower ranking on the spectrum.
That doesn't really apply to foreign media like the Guardian mentioned in the article.
These days "a well-known newspaper with a proven track-record in handling leaks" is pretty much longhand for "The Guardian."
I don't know what to think of this guy, he's like a pop-culture concept of Larry Flynt and what people imagined H. Ross Perot was in the early 90's.
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.